Settings and activity
58 results found
-
123 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
201 votes
Hello from the Mews product team,
Thank you for your suggestion, we have updated your request and set it as one to be upvoted by the Mews Community.
Remember you can share a link to your request so that your colleagues can also upvote your suggestion.
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
205 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
41 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
11 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
3 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
We’re facing the same issue on our end. With over 400 rooms, we sometimes need to block 80+ rooms at once, and the current process is quite time-consuming.
Ideally, a bulk “Out of Order” option would help significantly.
Also, there’s a related limitation: if a room (e.g., #123) is marked as dirty in the morning but will be ready by check-in time, we still want it available online to maximize sellable inventory. With your idea, that flexibility is missing.
Having better control over room status vs. availability would make a big difference operationally.