Settings and activity
53 results found
-
2 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
37 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
3 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
146 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
207 votes
Review of Mews Search starting and in exploration phase
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
313 votes
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Leo Blouin
commented
The keycutter integration settings would be the ideal location for this new feature.
This is particularly important when the locks are not set the right time (+/- 5min from real time) correctly. Nothing frustrates a guest more than going to their room and having to return to reception because it’s only a minute after check-out time.
Leo Blouin
supported this idea
·
We’re facing the same issue on our end. With over 400 rooms, we sometimes need to block 80+ rooms at once, and the current process is quite time-consuming.
Ideally, a bulk “Out of Order” option would help significantly.
Also, there’s a related limitation: if a room (e.g., #123) is marked as dirty in the morning but will be ready by check-in time, we still want it available online to maximize sellable inventory. With your idea, that flexibility is missing.
Having better control over room status vs. availability would make a big difference operationally.