Connect reservations without merging into group
If the channel manager has made reservations (and therefore it's not possible for the rest of us to merge groups), or if we have several bookings from different backgrounds and do not wish to mix their billings, it would be great to connect the reservations somehow. In stead of group, call it "related" or similar.
Alexander Oliver Olsson Foberg
shared this idea
Hello all,
This status update is part of our ongoing work to simplify and streamline how our UserVoice feedback forum operates. We are reducing the number of statuses to two (Idea to Upvote + Released) to help manage expectations about where each idea stands and to minimize the number of status updates required from our product teams. Our product team reviews everything you share, and we might reach out for more info if we need it.
Thanks for your patience as we work to bring your ideas to life! You can learn more about the changes coming to UserVoice from this post in the Mews Community.
-
labrique.nicolas
commented
Mews allows to merge reservations but in the case a guest extend his stay through OTA's , even if you merge reservations, reports will show that room both in arrivals and departures. If the night Audit and Housekeeping don't pay attention , we ask the guest to release the room whereas his stay continues. In that specific case, that would be great if Mews shown that room as "Stay Over" in the report.
-
Floris K.
commented
Right now to add bookings to the same 'group booking' you have to open the booking then click the '+ reservation' button. If you make a booking through the regular '+' icon that's always visible for example you can't send a confirmation with both bookings in the same email.
I'd like to have a function that simply allows you to couple or group bookings together to make this process easier.